Custom enterprise systems for corporations and government. Built since 2005, and yours to own.

Start a Project
The problem

The technology estate grew by accident

Systems were bought to solve individual problems over a decade. Nobody chose the resulting architecture. Several tools now overlap, integration is handled by manual copying, and a meaningful share of software spend goes on capability duplicated somewhere else — with nobody holding a complete inventory.

  • Overlapping tools bought by different departments
  • Data moved between systems by hand
  • No complete inventory of what is being paid for
  • Integration attempted repeatedly and abandoned
  • Renewals approved without evaluating whether they are still needed
What we build

What you get

Technology inventory

A complete picture of what you run, what it costs, who uses it and what it actually does — frequently the first time this has existed.

Overlap analysis

Where capability is duplicated across tools, and what consolidation would save.

Target architecture

A defined future state showing which systems are strategic, which are transitional and which should be retired.

Integration plan

How systems should connect, replacing manual data movement with defined interfaces.

Vendor rationalisation

A path from a sprawling vendor list to a manageable set, with migration sequencing.

Three-year phased plan

Sequenced by dependency and business priority, with each phase independently justifiable.

Financial projection

Cost, saving and return modelled across the period, including the cost of doing nothing.

Governance framework

How future technology decisions get made, so the estate does not fragment again.

What the engagement produces

15-25%

Technology cost reduction

15+ → 5-8

Vendor consolidation

40-60%

Less manual data movement

6-12 wks

Engagement length
Fit

Built for

  • Enterprises with fragmented technology estates
  • Mid-market companies running many disconnected platforms
  • Organisations where departments buy software independently
  • Businesses facing several major renewals at once
  • Leadership with no clear view of technology spend
Delivery

How the engagement runs

Six weeks for a focused scope, twelve for a standard roadmap, longer for complex enterprises.

Book a CallBook a Call
  1. Weeks 1-2

    Align to business strategy

    What the business is trying to do over the period, since a technology roadmap detached from that is just an inventory.

  2. Weeks 3-4

    Inventory and audit

    Everything you run, its cost, usage and contractual position, including the tools nobody has mentioned.

  3. Weeks 5-6

    Design target architecture

    The future state, with clear reasoning for each keep, replace or retire decision.

  4. Weeks 7-8

    Evaluate vendors

    Where replacement is indicated, structured evaluation against your requirements rather than vendor demonstrations.

  5. Weeks 9-10

    Build the roadmap

    Sequencing by dependency, risk and contract timing — renewal dates often determine order more than preference does.

  6. Weeks 11-12

    Budget and governance

    Financial model and the decision framework that keeps the estate coherent going forward.

Questions

Frequently asked

No, and a roadmap that does is not worth much. Most estates contain systems worth keeping, and the analysis is as much about identifying those as about replacement.

By involving departments in the assessment rather than presenting conclusions to them. Where a tool is genuinely doing a job, that surfaces during discovery. Where it is duplication, the evidence is visible to everyone.

Contract timing shapes the sequence. We plan around renewal dates, which frequently determines order more than technical preference, and identify where early exit is worth the penalty.

No. We have no reseller arrangements or vendor commissions, which is what allows the evaluation to be based on fit rather than on margin.

Also in this range

Strategic consulting

Digital Transformation Strategy

A sequenced plan, not a slide deck.

AI Readiness Assessment

Establish whether your data can support what you are planning.

Business Process Optimization

Fix the process before you automate it.

Tell us what you are trying to fix

A short call is usually enough to establish whether this is the right answer for your operation, and what it would take. No obligation and no pitch deck.

Start a ProjectStart a Project