The technology estate grew by accident
Systems were bought to solve individual problems over a decade. Nobody chose the resulting architecture. Several tools now overlap, integration is handled by manual copying, and a meaningful share of software spend goes on capability duplicated somewhere else — with nobody holding a complete inventory.
- Overlapping tools bought by different departments
- Data moved between systems by hand
- No complete inventory of what is being paid for
- Integration attempted repeatedly and abandoned
- Renewals approved without evaluating whether they are still needed
What you get
Technology inventory
A complete picture of what you run, what it costs, who uses it and what it actually does — frequently the first time this has existed.
Overlap analysis
Where capability is duplicated across tools, and what consolidation would save.
Target architecture
A defined future state showing which systems are strategic, which are transitional and which should be retired.
Integration plan
How systems should connect, replacing manual data movement with defined interfaces.
Vendor rationalisation
A path from a sprawling vendor list to a manageable set, with migration sequencing.
Three-year phased plan
Sequenced by dependency and business priority, with each phase independently justifiable.
Financial projection
Cost, saving and return modelled across the period, including the cost of doing nothing.
Governance framework
How future technology decisions get made, so the estate does not fragment again.
What the engagement produces
15-25%
Technology cost reduction15+ → 5-8
Vendor consolidation40-60%
Less manual data movement6-12 wks
Engagement lengthBuilt for
- Enterprises with fragmented technology estates
- Mid-market companies running many disconnected platforms
- Organisations where departments buy software independently
- Businesses facing several major renewals at once
- Leadership with no clear view of technology spend
How the engagement runs
Six weeks for a focused scope, twelve for a standard roadmap, longer for complex enterprises.
Book a CallBook a Call- Weeks 1-2
Align to business strategy
What the business is trying to do over the period, since a technology roadmap detached from that is just an inventory.
- Weeks 3-4
Inventory and audit
Everything you run, its cost, usage and contractual position, including the tools nobody has mentioned.
- Weeks 5-6
Design target architecture
The future state, with clear reasoning for each keep, replace or retire decision.
- Weeks 7-8
Evaluate vendors
Where replacement is indicated, structured evaluation against your requirements rather than vendor demonstrations.
- Weeks 9-10
Build the roadmap
Sequencing by dependency, risk and contract timing — renewal dates often determine order more than preference does.
- Weeks 11-12
Budget and governance
Financial model and the decision framework that keeps the estate coherent going forward.
Frequently asked
No, and a roadmap that does is not worth much. Most estates contain systems worth keeping, and the analysis is as much about identifying those as about replacement.
By involving departments in the assessment rather than presenting conclusions to them. Where a tool is genuinely doing a job, that surfaces during discovery. Where it is duplication, the evidence is visible to everyone.
Contract timing shapes the sequence. We plan around renewal dates, which frequently determines order more than technical preference, and identify where early exit is worth the penalty.
No. We have no reseller arrangements or vendor commissions, which is what allows the evaluation to be based on fit rather than on margin.
Strategic consulting
Digital Transformation Strategy
A sequenced plan, not a slide deck.
AI Readiness Assessment
Establish whether your data can support what you are planning.
Business Process Optimization
Fix the process before you automate it.
Tell us what you are trying to fix
A short call is usually enough to establish whether this is the right answer for your operation, and what it would take. No obligation and no pitch deck.
Start a ProjectStart a Project
